![]() ![]() All or most in the Influence (I) group were obviously Extraverted Feelers (EF’s). At the next level, all or most of the people in the Dominance (D) group were obviously Extraverted Thinkers (ET’s). So, as I wandered into the four separate groups of 15-20 members each and listened to their “authentic” interactions, a few things became clear to me.Īt the highest and simplest levels, it was obvious and quickly observable that D’s and I’s were all Extraverts, and S’s and C’s were all Introverts. Having “fast typed” for decades, it’s common for me to look for M&B types and preferences in real time. At that event, the facilitators broke the audience into four groups according to the “styles” (types) the participants had just discovered from their DISC test results: I have deep experience with the M&B model but not as much with the DISC model. Supporting Dataĭiscovering the Connection Between the Two Assessments My first “aha moment” as to the connection between DISC and M&B-and the M&B breadth advantage-came at a DISC training event I recently attended. I hope this clarifies the DISC-M&B connection! If you have the patience and the interest, below are the details of this analysis that led to these conclusions, along with some insightful quotes from Molly Owens of Truity. The author suggests M&B’s “deep dive” is best for yourself, your family and your close associates, beyond that, either DISC or M&B are proven assessments.Lowercase letters in M&B notation can be used to indicate you or others can easily show/display both a preference and its opposite (e.g., ENtJ, IsFP, …).Let your need for breadth, depth and ease-of-use be your guide in choosing between them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |